|
It is incumbent upon each of us to seriously ponder our future. It is imperative that each of us
be willing to study, once again, the great principles upon which this country was built. Such a
study demands that we re-familiarize ourselves with the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
We must re-read our Declaration of Independence. We must read the words of wisdom and warning delivered by our Founding Fathers. In short, we must be completely familiar with the principles of liberty, because those principles made us, and only those principles will keep us. |
The Democrats still don't get it.
Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| We have been lied to! |
|---|
Yeah, so what's new? Did you know we are shipping 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" uranium ore, removed from Tuwaitha, Iraq, and shipped to Canada for their power plants as partial payment for their help in the liberation in Iraq? That is enough to make 100 medium sized Nuclear BOMBS! Yeah, Saddam had no WMD... uh huh. All the while we are STILL being told the lie that "there was no WMD." Isn't this the basis for the chant "Bush lied" that everyone says? Ever wonder what the press and Democrat Congress WON'T DO to mislead us? |
Least we forget: In 1998, the U.S. Congress passed, and President Bill Clinton signed, the Iraq Liberation Act. That Act stated, "It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime." This legislation passed the Democrat controlled House by a vote of 360 to 38, and it passed the Democrats Senate without a single vote in opposition. Kinda removes the validity of the ignorant chant "Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11" that is also used repeatedly to mislead us. No one ever said it did, so why the continual repeating of the statement by the Democrats and their puppet press? |
On 11 November, President Bush noted: "While it is perfectly legitimate to criticize my decision or the conduct of the war, it is deeply irresponsible to rewrite the history of how that war began." |
|
"The disconnect between what Democrats are saying about Iraq and what is
actually happening there has reached grotesque proportions. Democrats won an
exhilarating electoral victory in 2006 pledging withdrawal at a time when
conditions in Iraq were dire and we were indeed losing the war. Two years
later, when everything is changed, they continue to reflexively repeat their
'narrative of defeat and retreat' (as Joe Lieberman so memorably called it)
as if nothing has changed... Obama and the Democrats would forfeit every one of
these successes to a declared policy of fixed and unconditional withdrawal. If
McCain cannot take to the American people the case for the folly of that
policy, he will not be president. Nor should he be." ---Charles Krauthammer |
| Note to those still voting for Obama: |
|---|
"Barack Obama, parroting the received wisdom of the Democratic foreign policy establishment, said that victory in any meaningful sense was not only unlikely, but that the presence of large numbers of American soldiers actually fed the insurgency and decreased the prospects for stability." If the war is LOST, then why is Al-Maliki declaring that Al-Qaeda, (our enemy and responsible for 9/11), has lost in Iraq? Facts: Fifteen of eighteen benchmarks have been reached, all the parties are in negotiation over future politics, al Qaeda is close to dead at the hands of the US and the Iraqis, and oil contracts are being handed out amid four-year lows in violence. Attacks in Iraq are down more than 90 percent over the previous year. "Let me be as clear as I can be," says Obama. "I intend to end this war. My first day in office I will bring the Joint Chiefs of Staff in and I will give them a new mission and that is to end this war - responsibly, deliberately, but decisively." The only way to end a war "responsibly, deliberately and decisively" is victory. Don't grab defeate out of the jaws of victory, please! Arguably, since our nation's founding, no candidate has been less qualified than Obama to be his political party's nominee for president of the United States. And nowhere is Obama more ill prepared than in matters of national security. Barack Obama, the national security neophyte, continues to prove himself unworthy of the title "Commander in Chief." Obama tripped up on national security numerous times this week. First, as the situation in Iraq continues improving, Obama continues to stick by his 16-month plan for withdrawal. However, his campaign did scrub his Web site over the weekend, removing all criticism of the surge. Instead, it cites an "improved security situation" en route to advocating more change (read: retreat). Barack will travel to the Middle East beginning today, with a stop in Europe on the way. And he will have groupies -- namely ABC anchor Charles Gibson, CBS anchor Katie Couric and NBC anchor Brian Williams, who will tag along and fawn appropriately. Next up, the infamous New Yorker magazine article referenced above quotes Obama as saying, "My grandfather signed up for a war the day after Pearl Harbor was bombed, fought in Patton's Army. He saw the dead and dying across the fields of Europe; he heard the stories of fellow troops who first entered Auschwitz and Treblinka..." Obama stuck his foot in his mouth on Auschwitz before, and we noted that the Red Army of Soviet Russia liberated that camp. Treblinka, on the other hand, was closed and destroyed by the Germans in 1943. Oops. Finally, a gaffe that is far more worrisome than the others: According to Obama, the U.S. "cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set." He continued, "We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded." Wait a minute. Will this "national security force" also wear brown shirts? Oddly enough, it seems that Obama's campaign realized that wouldn't fly -- the line was stricken from the transcripts given to the media, though it is still in the video posted on YouTube. And tell me why again we want this man as our Commander in Chief? - jb |
| Obama Just Doesn't get it yet! |
|---|
|
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free
State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms, shall not be
infringed." --Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Yesterday, in a narrow 5-4 vote (Scalia, Alito, Roberts, Thomas and Kennedy), the Supreme Court reaffirmed, in District of Columbia v. Heller, that the people's inherent right to keep and bear arms is plainly enumerated in our Constitution. The Court ruled that the Second Amendment ensures an individual right, that DC could not ban handguns, and that operable guns may be maintained in the homes of law-abiding DC residents. In a masterful feat of doubletalk, Barack Hussein Obama, who erroneously asserts, "The notion that somehow local jurisdictions can't initiate gun laws isn't borne out by our Constitution," claims the Supreme Court agreed with his interpretation. Mind you, this is the same Barack Obama who recently said, "I have never favored an all-out ban on handguns," even while denying the plain truth that his signature appears on a questionnaire indicating that he does favor such a ban; the same Barack Obama who recently said during a 16 April debate when asked by Charlie Gibson whether the DC gun ban is consistent with the Constitution, "Well, Charlie, I confess I obviously haven't listened to the briefs and looked at all the evidence." Would Obama make the same argument about local jurisdictions regulating issues like segregation? Does he suggest, by extension then, that our national Constitution can be amended by judicial dictates and local ordinances? I can't help but ponder how future 2A cases would fare if the Obama/Clinton ticket wins in November and then stacks the courts with judicial activists who subscribe to their adulterated view of a "Living Constitution." Michelle Obama says her husband will fight for equality for gays just as he fought to help working-class families overcome poverty. The wife of Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama spoke Thursday night in New York City at a fundraising dinner for the Democratic National Committee's Gay and Lesbian Leadership Council. She spoke about her husband's record pushing for workplace discrimination legislation in Illinois when he served in the Legislature there. Barack Obama has said it should be up to individual states to decide whether to allow gay marriage. Michelle Obama says he wants equal treatment for any relationship recognized under state law. And you still think Obamama is better than McCain? Think again. -JB |
|
From our guestbook: The first document of the founders was written before America was even a united nation. That first document is the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson, already proven to be a Deist and not a Christian, wrote this document. In the Declaration God is referred to as Nature's God, the Creator, Supreme Judge of the World, and divine Providence. Nowhere in the Declaration is God referred to as Jesus, Jehovah, or any other Judeo-Christian name. If America was intended to be a Christian nation the Declaration of Independence would have been filled with Biblical references. But the contrary is true. There is not one reference in it to the Bible or any Christian character or dogma. I agree, see what Ronald Regan said about this, he said it well. Just above that, read what our Constitution actually says about it. - JB |
| As I have said before, it will take decades to recover
from the damage that Bill Clinton did to this country. Once again you can see he criticizes a
reporter about an article he hasn't even read. --JB
Newsmax Online Magazine "He's a really dishonest reporter," Clinton said during the tirade that followed, according to Fowler's report. "And I haven't read (the article). There's just five or six blatant lies in there. But he's a real slimy guy." How can Billery claim that the reporter lied when he hasn't even read the article yet? Talk about being dishonest... If you want to refute something, you need specifics. There are none, just name calling. |
|
"The big difference between Republicans and liberal Democrats is the way
each party views people. Republicans see us as individuals and respect our
God-given human dignity. To liberal Democrats, we're not individuals; we're
members of a herd with all the dignity of a cow or pig dependent on its owner
for daily rations of hay or slop... They submerge
us into pools that define us as members of groups instead of as what we are as
God sees us - as any father sees his children - each being different from one
another, and each child being a separate and distinct individual with his or
her own specific talents and abilities, and all deserving of his love... This
Marxist view of human nature embraces group-think, despises individuality,
and seeks to eliminate all vestiges of the dignity to which every human
being created in the image and likeness of God is entitled. Only the hopes
and aspirations of the groups matter, and they matter solely because they
create dependency on the state - which seeks to supplant God as the source
of all that is good and necessary for survival." ---Michael Reagan Read: The Democrats still don't get it. |
| More Bad News... |
|---|
|
On April 18, 2008 China won another battle in its one-sided trade war against the United States when
America's last remaining motorcycle maker, Harley-Davidson, announced plans to lay off 730 workers.
These workers will join the approximately 2.3 million Americans who have already lost their
good-paying manufacturing jobs to the Chinese strategy of selling to the United States without
buying from us. But Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain are all ignoring the mercantilism being practiced by China and other Asian nations. In effect they are joining the Chinese government in telling Harley-Davidson to move its factories to China. Pacifism doesn't work when fighting military wars, and it doesn't work when fighting trade wars. The U.S. government passivity as the Asian governments have stolen industry after industry from us has placed the U.S. economy in peril. It's time that the United States started to fight back. Maybe you should use your Tax Rebate Stimulous Check to Buy American? -JRB Read the entire article. |


Opening up with the Reverend and his G-D America rant, then going to the announcer explaining how it was that Oprah quit the Church because she wanted no part of such attitudes, and Rev. Wright attacked her for it, then maybe a picture of Wright with Farrakhan and Qaddafi, then maybe Wright with the Obamas on their wedding day, and closing with something like, "It's not a question of free speech. It's not about religious freedom. It's about judgment, and whose you trust your future to..." |
| If it takes Obama 20 years to notice that his pastor is a traitorous, racist nut-job, it will probably take him his full term of office to realize that the U.S. has been invaded and subdued by al-Qaida. Let's just hope President Obama pays closer attention during national security briefings than he did during 20 years of the Rev. Wright's church services." ---Ann Coulter |
What a wonderful tribute to US.
We rarely get a chance to see another country's editorial about the USA.
Read this excerpt from a Romanian Newspaper. The article was written by
Mr. Cornel Nistorescu and published under the title 'C'ntarea Americii,
meaning 'Ode To America ' in the Romanian newspaper Evenimentulzilei
'The Daily Event' or 'News of the Day' .
|
|
Jan 03, 2008 The family of a naturalized American citizen who was arrested, tortured, and executed in Iran, have won a $466 million judgment in U.S. federal court against the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran, the intelligence ministry, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps. Former Iranian air force officer Siavash Bayani was executed in August 1997, two years after returning to Iran to care for his terminally-ill mother. He was repeatedly tortured during his detention in Tehran's notorious Evin prison. Yeah McCain, don't you dare let us waterboard one of them, that's not fair... uh huh. |
|
Dec 18, 2007 Top Republicans in Congress are surprisingly upbeat on the mammoth $515 billion spending bill that passed the House on Monday night, despite the fact that it includes no money to fund the troops in Iraq. Minority Whip Roy Blunt, R-Mo., told a group of bloggers at The Heritage Foundation today that money for the troops in Iraq would be added separately, and that Republicans could "take credit" for holding spending to levels that were significantly lower than what the Democrats had initially planned. Where is Bushes veto pen? ...freakin' wimp! |
"After three days of screaming headlines about the CIA destroying videotapes in 2005 of the 'harsh' interrogation of two terrorists, it now comes to light that in 2002 key members of Congress were fully briefed by the CIA about those interrogation techniques, including waterboarding. One member of that Congressional delegation was the future House Speaker, Nancy Pelosi... Porter Goss, the former chair of the House Intelligence Committee who later served as CIA director from 2004 to 2006 is explicit about what happened in these meetings: 'Among those being briefed, there was a pretty full understanding of what the CIA was doing. And the reaction in the room was not just approval, but encouragement.' In all, the CIA provided Congress with some 30 briefings on waterboarding before it became a public issue... One certainly may hold as abhorrent the idea of aggressively interrogating any terrorists ever, either for fear of what they might do to our people, as John McCain does, or because one thinks this violates our values. What one may not do---at least not if one wants the system to function---is assent to such a policy in 2002 and then, when the policy is made public, put up the pretense that one is 'shocked' and appalled to learn of it. This is bad faith." ---The Wall Street Journal Can you spell "hypocrite"? How about "Opportunist", or "LIAR!" |
KHARTOUM, Sudan (AP) - Thousands of Sudanese, many armed with clubs and knives, rallied Friday in a central square and demanded the execution of a British teacher convicted of insulting Islam for allowing her students to name a teddy bear "Muhammad." Sorry, but... "I'm not gonna put my wife in a hijab. And I'm not gonna put my daughter in a burqa. And I'm not getting on my all-fours and braying to Mecca. And you could drop dead if you don't like it. You can shove it up your pipe. I don't wanna hear anymore about Islam. I don't wanna hear one more word about Islam. Take your religion and shove it up your behind. I'm sick of you." "What kind of religion is this? What kind of world are you living in when you let them in here with that throwback document in their hand, which is a book of hate. Don't tell me I need re-education. They need deportation. I don't need re-education. Deportation, not re-education. You can take C-A-I-R and throw 'em out of my country. I'd raise the American flag and I'd get out my trumpet if you did it. Without due process. You can take your due process and shove it." "What sane nation that worships the U.S. Constitution, which is the greatest document of freedom ever written, would bring in people who worship a book that tells them the exact opposite. Make no mistake about it, the Quran is not a document of freedom. The Quran is a document of slavery and chattel. It teaches you that you are a slave." -- Nationally syndicated radio host Michael Savage -- Monday, December 3, 2007 1:25 PM Listen to it: http://www.cair.com/audio/savage_102907.asp for more. Read what caused his outburst: http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/savage/2007/12/03/54101.html |

United States Constitution Bill of Rights Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Amendment X The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. It says that "Congress shall make no law...". So, where does it say that the states, local schools, cities, and courthouses cannot display the Ten Commandments, the foundation of all our laws? Go ask a liberal.... There is no such clause that says "Separation of Church and State". It is only a made up catch phrase for the lemmings to follow. |
Our founding fathers
had a reason to mention God, a generic God, as an essentual requirement to be
part of the lives of our government officials. Ronald Reagan said it well:
|
As one of our founding fathers once said:"[D]emocracy will soon degenerate into an anarchy, such an anarchy that every man will do what is right in his own eyes and no man's life or property or reputation or liberty will be secure, and every one of these will soon mould itself into a system of subordination of all the moral virtues and intellectual abilities, all the powers of wealth, beauty, wit and science, to the wanton pleasures, the capricious will, and the execrable cruelty of one or a very few." -- John Adams (An Essay on Man's Lust for Power, 29 August 1763) Reference: Original Intent, Barton (338); original The Papers of John Adams, Taylor, ed., vol. 1 (83) So, go ahead and vote for a "Democrat", you will get just what John Adams and the others knew they would be. That is also why we are not, and were never supposed to be a "democracy"! - John Beaman - Read more... Still don't believe it? Maybe you need a refresher course: Read this. |
| Search this site! |
This website is a not-for-profit effort, and is
totally funded by the author, with a little help
from contributors. If you feel you have
been helped by our information, we would appreciate
any contributions you feel appropriate. Mail to:
John Beaman The Patriots PageOr, send it thru PayPal to JRBeaman@w3f.com and mark it "Donation" in the subject line. Note: To avoid the plethora of IRS regulations on the editorial content of "charitable" publications (and targeted audits against conservative organizations), we have not chosen "charitable" tax status and contributions are not tax deductible. |
|
|
|
The ads shown here may not necessarily represent our views,
but you should certainly feel free to visit them if you wish.
|
![]() |